Informal Coalitions
Informal Coalitions
A few years back, I was a member of a group that was looking to design the managerial roles, management systems and work processes for a new organisation. We were being helped by one of the then Big Five consultancy firms. As part of this, the consultants produced a set of draft job descriptions, which included one for the role that I would be filling.
I saw the descriptions as bland, matter-of-fact and limiting.
But, when I argued that I was not excited by them, my comments were dismissed by the in-house sponsor: "Job descriptions are not meant to excite," he insisted, "Provided they set out the main activities of the role and identify what’s in and what’s not, that’s good enough for me." My continued protests fell on deaf ears. Or so I thought.
During a break, the Director chairing the meeting confided that he’d agreed with what I’d said. Of course, he couldn’t say so in the meeting itself - money had been spent on getting the experts’ advice and the ‘defender in chief’ was his right-hand man – but he asked me to send him an outline of my thoughts. And so, the Contribution Statement was born.
I have been a fan of Ralph Stacey’s work since I first purchased one of his early books (Dynamic Strategic Management for the 1990s) almost 20 years ago. In particular, I have been attracted by his willingness – eagerness even – to challenge conventional thinking and practice in relation to the leadership and dynamics of organizations. The latest edition of his textbook on the subject, Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, continues this tradition.
Continue reading "Stacey on Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics" »
"Keep it Simple!" How often have you heard this phrase used to signal the need for a change in the way that business is carried out or that organizations function?
Recently, it appeared on the cover of the Chartered Management Institute's journal, Management Today. This featured two articles about, as the MT put it, "managing complexity". The first, How to Survive Complexity, charted a round-table discussion on the subject between a number of senior executives and advisory specialists. The second, Simplicity: Not as Easy as it Looks by journalist John Morrish, suggested that although "simplicity has become the modern mantra of business ... it's easier said than done."
The call for greater simplicity in organizational design, management and operation is a natural, commonsense reaction to the overly complicated nature of many modern-day organizations. However, it is misleading and unhelpful to talk of this in terms of "managing complexity".
Continue reading "The “keep it simple” mantra and the complex dynamics of organizations" »
I was delighted to read the words of Harvard Business Review’s editor, Thomas A. Stewart, in his editorial introduction to the June 2008 edition. In his piece headed “Tools for Change,” he briefly previews the journal’s lead article, “The Secrets to Successful Strategy Execution”.
In re-stating the authors’ claim that clarifying decision rights and designing information flows are the most important aspects of execution, he points out that “… those [areas] are the least subject to corner-office diktats. They involve dirty hands and messy conversations [my emphasis].”
Reading this, I eagerly thumbed through the pages of the journal to see what the authors had to say about the messy conversations at the heart of strategy development and delivery …
Continue reading "The secrets to successful strategy execution - sort of, perhaps!" »
Following recent setbacks at the polls, speculation is rife within the Labour Party over the future of Gordon Brown as leader. And, as we can see from comments by Times Assistant Editor Peter Riddell in today's paper, the dynamics of informal coalitions will have a big part to play in deciding whether the Prime Minister goes or stays.
Continue reading "Conversations, coalitions and change in New Labour?" »
Recent Comments