I was delighted to read the words of Harvard Business Review’s editor, Thomas A. Stewart, in his editorial introduction to the June 2008 edition. In his piece headed “Tools for Change,” he briefly previews the journal’s lead article, “The Secrets to Successful Strategy Execution”.
In re-stating the authors’ claim that clarifying decision rights and designing information flows are the most important aspects of execution, he points out that “… those [areas] are the least subject to corner-office diktats. They involve dirty hands and messy conversations [my emphasis].”
Reading this, I eagerly thumbed through the pages of the journal to see what the authors had to say about the messy conversations at the heart of strategy development and delivery …
Continue reading "The secrets to successful strategy execution - sort of, perhaps!" »
Conversations, coalitions and change in New Labour?
Following recent setbacks at the polls, speculation is rife within the Labour Party over the future of Gordon Brown as leader. And, as we can see from comments by Times Assistant Editor Peter Riddell in today's paper, the dynamics of informal coalitions will have a big part to play in deciding whether the Prime Minister goes or stays.
Continue reading "Conversations, coalitions and change in New Labour?" »
Posted on 26 May 2008 in Building Coalitions, Informal Coalitions - Origins and Approach, News Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Tags: informal coalitions, Labour leadership challenge, Labour Party, New Labour, Peter Riddell
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |