informal coalitions

Drucker on controls and control

In Is a Balanced Scorecard Bad?, Jonathan Becher argues "... metrics by themselves are unlikely to increase the performance of an organization... metrics must be accompanied by objectives and initiatives."  This echoes Peter Drucker's often repeated view that:

• controls are different from control; and, most importantly, that
• more controls do not necessarily lead to more control.

Becher makes the equally important point that use of the term "scorecard" inevitably places undue emphasis on measures (ie 'scores' and scorekeeping).  As I've suggested elsewhere, organizational scorekeepers and commentators are too often seen as more important than the players!

Key influence #5 - Gareth Morgan

Gareth Morgan is Distinguished Research Professor at the Schulich School of Business, York University, Toronto. He is a writer and management consultant, who places particular emphasis on the use of metaphor and paradox to understand the dynamics of organizations and the challenges of change. I first saw Morgan in action at a full-day session of the Independent Change Management Forum in 1997, in which he explored various aspects of metaphor and paradox in relation to organizational change. This reinforced my attraction to the use of metaphor and analogy as language and thinking tools. His discussion of the paradoxical nature of organizations also re-ignited my interest in this important but under-explored and misunderstood aspect of organizational dynamics.

Key influence #4 - Clough and Taylor

"SOS Bring Back Clough"

On Tuesday 16 October 1973, Brian Clough and Peter Taylor resigned as manager and assistant manager of Derby County Football Club.  They had been forced out of their jobs by a Board that lacked the vision to see what was unfolding before them, as the team scaled the heights of a European Cup semi-final only five years after finishing near the foot of the then Second Division. A small number of men, who were not prepared to live in Clough’s shadow and who were bolstered by their command of the majority of shares in the Club, successfully forced Clough and Taylor out of Derby County and ended the most successful period in the Club’s history. 

Key influence #3 - Robert Quinn

Robert Quinn is Distinguished Professor of Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management at the University of Michigan Business School. He is a researcher, analyst and writer in the field of organizational behaviour. I was first attracted to his approach in the book Beyond Rational Management, which introduced his "competing values framework" as a way of viewing the paradoxical nature of organizations.

Key influence #2 - Edward de Bono

Edward de Bono is internationally known for his work on creativity and as the originator of the concept of lateral thinking. His academic background is in psychology and medicine, and he has held faculty appointments at the universities of Oxford, Cambridge, London and Harvard. He is a prolific author and has taught thinking in both business and academic forums.

Taking de Bono's ideas laterally

De Bono’s work has had a significant effect on my thinking since the late 1960s. A key contribution has been his articulation of the brain as a self-organizing system; and, in my view, many of the more appealing theories on the dynamics of organizations (eg as set out by the Stacey school) are consistent with the ideas that he has been advancing for many years. The more that I have developed my thinking on organizations as networks of ongoing, self-organizing conversations, the more parallels that seem to exist with de Bono’s many writings on the brain and lateral thinking.

Key influence #1 - Ralph Stacey

Ralph Stacey is Professor of Management and Director of the Complexity and Management Centre at the Business School of the University of Hertfordshire. He is also a member of the Institute of Group Analysis. He consults at many levels across a range or organizations and is the author of a number of thought-leading books and articles on strategy and complexity theory in management. His work has had a significant impact on my approach to change leadership and organizational dynamics, as reflected in the pages of Informal Coalitions.